Liga Siatkowki, Women
Liga Siatkowki, Women
Introduction
Ranking | TeamName | Matches | P | W | D | L | PTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | KS Developres Rzeszów | 11 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 22 |
2 | Radomka Radom | 11 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 22 |
3 | ?KS Commercecon ?ód? | 11 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 22 |
4 | BKS Stal Bielsko-Bia?a | 11 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 20 |
5 | Budowlani ?ód? | 11 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 18 |
6 | Chemik Police | 11 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 16 |
7 | Energa MKS Kalisz | 11 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 15 |
8 | Pa?ac Bydgoszcz | 11 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 15 |
9 | DPD Legionovia Legionowo | 11 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 14 |
10 | Impel Wroc?aw | 11 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 12 |
11 | Joker Mekro Energoremont Swiecie | 11 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
12 | PTPS Pi?a | 11 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 |
In the event that two (or more) teams have an equal number of points, the following rules break the tie: 1. Number of victories 2. Goal difference 3. Gamepoint percentage |
Liga Siatkowki Women Team Standings home 2020
Ranking | TeamName | Matches | P | W | D | L | PTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | KS Developres Rzeszów | 11 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 31 |
2 | Chemik Police | 11 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 30 |
3 | Radomka Radom | 11 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 26 |
4 | ?KS Commercecon ?ód? | 11 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 24 |
5 | DPD Legionovia Legionowo | 11 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 19 |
6 | Budowlani ?ód? | 11 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 17 |
7 | BKS Stal Bielsko-Bia?a | 11 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 17 |
8 | Energa MKS Kalisz | 11 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 16 |
9 | Pa?ac Bydgoszcz | 11 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 13 |
10 | Impel Wroc?aw | 11 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
11 | Joker Mekro Energoremont Swiecie | 11 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 5 |
12 | PTPS Pi?a | 11 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 4 |
In the event that two (or more) teams have an equal number of points, the following rules break the tie: 1. Number of victories 2. Goal difference 3. Gamepoint percentage |
Liga Siatkowki Women Team Standings total 2020
Ranking | TeamName | Matches | P | W | D | L | PTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | KS Developres Rzeszów | 22 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 4 | 53 |
2 | Radomka Radom | 22 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 5 | 48 |
3 | Chemik Police | 22 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 6 | 46 |
4 | ?KS Commercecon ?ód? | 22 | 4 | 15 | 0 | 7 | 46 |
5 | BKS Stal Bielsko-Bia?a | 22 | 5 | 12 | 0 | 10 | 37 |
6 | Budowlani ?ód? | 22 | 6 | 13 | 0 | 9 | 35 |
7 | DPD Legionovia Legionowo | 22 | 7 | 12 | 0 | 10 | 33 |
8 | Energa MKS Kalisz | 22 | 8 | 10 | 0 | 12 | 31 |
9 | Pa?ac Bydgoszcz | 22 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 14 | 28 |
10 | Impel Wroc?aw | 22 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 16 | 21 |
11 | Joker Mekro Energoremont Swiecie | 22 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 18 | 14 |
12 | PTPS Pi?a | 22 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 4 |
In the event that two (or more) teams have an equal number of points, the following rules break the tie: 1. Number of victories 2. Goal difference 3. Gamepoint percentage |